New York: Part One

One of the things I like to tell people about Western Massachusetts which is both strictly true and kind of misleading is that we’re “only three hours from New York”, which makes it sound like an exciting day trip we could do any weekend.

It’s strictly true because, sure, if you were to leave at a carefully selected low-traffic time (after midnight works pretty well, as Mike has found on work “day” trips) and drive straight from our house to New York City, keeping to road-safe speeds (which are not the same thing as the speed limit; my experience is that on the interstates you generally have to stick to about 10mph above the posted limit to not attract crazy driving) you’d arrive at the outskirts of New York in three hours. Maybe even a little less.

In terms of actually visiting, it’s rather more complicated, because you’re best off avoiding taking a car into Manhattan. On our flying visit last year, we took the bus; this time, we drove to New Haven and caught the train from there, which takes a little longer but is significantly less stressful. And, given New York parking rates, a little cheaper than trying to park your car in New York. (There is the caveat that you’re leaving it in New Haven, a city not precisely known for its peaceful, crime-free streets, but our car is just old enough that there’s probably always going to be something else more worth stealing in the same parking lot.)

I was determined to make this weekend the weekend in which we did ALL THE TOURIST THINGS in New York (or at least all the winter-appropriate tourist things). By late Sunday afternoon we’d reached the point where we collapsed in our hotel room and only moved to open the door for the pizza delivery guy, so I feel we achieved ALL THE TOURIST THINGS, and there will, hence, be several posts. The one thing we didn’t manage was visiting DUB Pies, because it turned out to be just one thing too many to squish into our schedule, but: next time.

The two big museums we hit were the American Museum of Natural History and the Metropolitan Museum of Art. I crossed off the Museum of Modern Art and the Guggenheim for this trip because a) time and b) modern art. (I know what I like, art-wise, and it mostly involves things done before 1800, 1900 at a stretch. I don’t have anything against all the rest of it, I just wasn’t going to spend limited excursion time on it.)

The American Museum of Natural History has its own subway station, which is pretty cool.

With fossils in the walls. And drawn on the floor tiles, but I didn't get any pictures of those.

The AMNH was amazing, but in a very specific way: Mike and I have both reached the point, age- and learning-wise, where science museums have ceased to be a big learning experience. The AMNH is clearly organised and built to teach people about science and natural history (the inclusion of displays on Native American populations is, um, well, the rest of the museum is basically things (largely rock-adjacent things), extinct things, animals, and dead animals, so that’s….I get the anthropology association, I do, but when that’s the only anthropology bit it’s…not a great look.) And I think it does a great job. We went to the planetarium show, and it was frankly incredible; it laid out stellar evolution in a really comprehensible and visually spectacular way. I would have killed to see it as a kid, I’m not even exaggerating very much.

But all of the actual science bit was stuff we already knew. I geeked out bigtime in the Earth History exhibit because they had bits of deep-sea hydrothermal chimneys from which my lab has cultured organisms, they had wind-sculpted rock from the Antarctic Dry Valleys which is where my Honours thesis organisms came from, they had pillow lava like I saw on last summer’s telepresence cruise, etc. It was stuff that’s important to my life as a scientist, but I knew what it was before I got there.

ACTUAL BITS OF ACTUAL HYDROTHERMAL VENTS. This picture does not adequately convey how much geeking out I was doing.

We spent most of our time in the museum taking pictures and going “ooooh, look at that” rather than reading informative placards, because it was a better use of time. I think my favourite bit – apart from the hydrothermal chimneys – was the African dioramas; they were so detailed and lifelike. Better than zoos, in a lot of ways – you’re guaranteed to see the animals!

The dioramas reminded me how many big, strange, and interesting megafauna there actually are in the world. (That aren't, you know, rapidly going extinct. Or that are.)

And, of course, the dinosaur (and other prehistoric animal) exhibits. Because dinosaur skeletons will never be not awesome. Never.

TRICERATOPS = AWESOME,.

LARGE CARNIVOROUS THERAPOD OF SOME TYPE = ALSO AWESOME.

The only other thing about the AMNH: the place is a maze, and it’s a maze that keeps bewilderingly leading you in and out of the ticketed areas. We must have shown our tickets half-a-dozen times without ever leaving the museum building. I’m usually OK if you give me a map, but it was really head-turningly complex.

By the time we got to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, it was Sunday afternoon and we were both tired but soldiering gamely on (from bench to bench, I will admit.) As soon as we’d got our tickets (not actually tickets, but neat little badges) I announced I wanted to see the temple in the Egyptian section. When we got there, Mike was confused.

“They have a room with an actual Egyptian temple,” he said.

“Yes,” I replied, “you did hear me when I said I wanted to see the temple, right?”

“I thought it was a replica!”

The motto of Western imperialism: never build a replica when you can take a whole building.

The Met was full of beautiful and fascinating things, from Ancient Egypt to the nineteenth century, but I found it lacked context. Almost everything had bare descriptive labels and collection numbers; no explanation of where it was from, why it was important, why it was here. I suppose that’s what the audio tours or the guided tours are for, but I would have liked to see some more explanation in text. Then again, there were so many things that there was scarcely room for it, but you could have taken half of them away and still had spectacular exhibits. It was maddeningly, impossibly large; we only took on the challenge of two or three areas, and even that was more than enough. I think it would take a week or three to do the whole place properly.

A minute fraction of all the shortswords on display. Just the shortswords, mind, there's a lot more swords than that.

I don’t think we’ll be going back to the museums any time soon, unless we go with friends or family or there’s some particular exhibit we decide we want to see; but I’m glad we saw them once.

This entry posted in Uncategorized. Entry Tags: , , , , , Bookmark the permalink. 

6 Responses to New York: Part One

  1. Phil Stewart says:

    Oops, now I’m feeling guilty for not taking you to the Carter Observatory when you were little – sounds like we narrowly escaped a grisly end at the hands of our star-struck daughter! I went to the planetarium show there last week as part of the science communicators’ conference – I bet it wasn’t a patch on what you saw, but I liked our host, the young dreadlocked Alf, who drily observed at one point: “there’s sweet f*** all in THAT part of the universe”. Two big museums in a day is a big ask, as you’ll recall from our UK/France excursion. Te Maori was at the met we we went there, which was simultaneously cool and disconcerting (Maori stuff? In New York?). It was only the 80s.

    • No need to feel guilty – I don’t know if I ever saw the planetarium show, but I certainly spent a lot of time at the Carter Observatory (and out on various stargazing trips) as a child, largely courtesy of Marilyn.

      We didn’t do two museums in a day, or not quite – these posts are broken up by theme rather than time. We did the AMNH, the Empire State Building, shopping, and Broadway on Saturday, and Ellis Island and the Met on Sunday. Still a pretty packed schedule, though!

  2. Rose says:

    I know what you mean abot so much to see. Th steps up to a museum entrance make me feel tired just looking at them. Much better to live in the city of the museum and see it in small bites – funny thing is when you live there you don’t go because you could go any time. Well not entirely true – I am quite sure if we lived in NY we woudl have had weekly trips just like we did to the old Wellington museum

  3. Tui says:

    I had a similar science museum experience in London a couple of years ago; I went with a friend and, yeah, when it came to the science and technology stuff it was clearly pitched at ages 7-15. Some obvious school project stuff. And yet weirdly heaps of fun, except for the bit in the human reproduction section where it was like “breasts exist to differentiate the sexes and attract men.” No. No, they don’t.

    We also went to the Met when I was in New York. (With Kim Tattersall. It was a bit of a Guided Tour of Classical Art.) I remember the temple room very well. And YES there was SO MUCH there it was kind of incredible.

    • when it came to the science and technology stuff it was clearly pitched at ages 7-15

      I wouldn’t say this was quite true of the AMNH – though absolutely true of the Boston Museum of Science – it was more that even the bits which were pitched for all ages were pitched for people with no or little science background, not even the educated layperson (i.e. you or Mike) and definitely not working scientists. Which is cool, I’m very much not their intended audience – it’s just a change from going to museums as a kid.

      We also went to the Met when I was in New York. (With Kim Tattersall. It was a bit of a Guided Tour of Classical Art.)

      Sounds like the perfect way to do it. I think if I went back I’d go with some sort of tour of a particular section, maybe an audio guide, although I’m a little burned on those after the Empire State Building people gave me one in French, of which I could understand just enough to annoy me.

    • Also, the breasts thing: WTF, is all I can say. MAMMALS, PEOPLE, WE’RE MAMMALS. THINK ABOUT IT.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>